I’ve wondered too bro. I can’t help but think there’s no advantage or disadvantage to running one. Since the car doesn’t lose camber in turns, why lock both sides so they can help brace each other in turns? U know? Making things more rigid, for what exactly?
Locking the chassis to the front subframe, no one can even question its functionalityI can say I didn’t feel much difference with a FSB. With the strut towers being attached to the fire wall on these cars they have much less flex up top than the older Hondas of past.
But you know already. Old habits die hard….
I felt the most difference in chassis stiffness and flex reduction by adding the Spoon Front stiff plate.
Difference is minimal. the only real way to tell is drive the car spiritedly before install then go back on the same road after and feel the slight changes. It's their but unless you're really in tune then it'll go unnoticed for the most part.
Normal. Had the bar on a few cars. On my srt4 acr it did a gnarly creak but only when I went up the driveway slowly. Freaking sounded spooky as hell
Yeah, my Evo never did that before, and neither did my previous Hondas. Regarding the torque, I started using it after I got trained and learned what it was. Before that, it was still “lefty tighty” converted to “lefty loosey,” or “lefty stays in your hand.”Normal. Had the bar on a few cars. On my srt4 acr it did a gnarly creak but only when I went up the driveway slowly. Freaking sounded spooky as hell
as far as that tq value. No idea bro. Sorry. My people just tighten till our ancestors say stop
Oooh gotcha. I’d wait and see what other folks say then in regards to that tq value. Just in case.Yeah, my Evo never did that before, and neither did my previous Hondas. Regarding the torque, I started using it after I got trained and learned what it was. Before that, it was still “lefty tighty” converted to “lefty loosey,” or “lefty stays in your hand.”
