High Efficiency Downpipe VS Catless?

WhiteFuryDC5

Member
First Name
Corey
Joined
Sep 1, 2025
Threads
11
Messages
36
Reaction score
2
Location
Somewhere I belong
Vehicle(s)
2025 FL5 Type R, 2023 G80 M3 Competition Carbon M, 2019 Range Rover Sport
TSP said they don't offer their tunes with turning off the O2 sensors, but they said they have a high efficiency cat. In their downpipe. That has good gains. Is this going to be as good as catalyst? I really want to hear that turbo whistle like I had on my old BMW with the catless downpipe. Nothing sounds better in my opinion. However, performance wise and sound wise is a high efficient Downpipe going to be. Good enough?
Sponsored

 
OP
OP
WhiteFuryDC5

WhiteFuryDC5

Member
First Name
Corey
Joined
Sep 1, 2025
Threads
11
Messages
36
Reaction score
2
Location
Somewhere I belong
Vehicle(s)
2025 FL5 Type R, 2023 G80 M3 Competition Carbon M, 2019 Range Rover Sport
Also what about 02 non foulers? There are adapters I have used that actually work well. I have stacked 2 spark flug non foulers on my old bmw m3 and elongated the center out. Never had a light.
 

PointByPatrol

Senior Member
First Name
Ben
Joined
Jul 28, 2023
Threads
41
Messages
1,905
Reaction score
2,971
Location
NC
Vehicle(s)
2024 Civic Type R
Build Thread
Link
Ultimately depends on where you live and if you can slide in under the regulations. Catless will offer better heat extraction, flow, and power gains, but is likely illegal in all 50 states. The high flow cat options actually work quite well, and provide plenty of turbo noise.
 

ctechauto

CivicX Basic Sponsor
Joined
Apr 4, 2025
Threads
16
Messages
276
Reaction score
409
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
FL5, FK8, EK9, 981, Gen 3 Raptor
HE cats like GESi (what TSP and RV6 uses), HJS, etc now are so good now, power gains over catless are pretty negligible. A couple/few hp (unless you're at like 700hp+). My shop is in an emission-less county but wont install catless for a customer (liability) because the surrounding major counties have emission inspections, but again, I explain its neglible anyway in terms of power differences. The turbo sound whistle will be a little more pronounced on a catless though.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
WhiteFuryDC5

WhiteFuryDC5

Member
First Name
Corey
Joined
Sep 1, 2025
Threads
11
Messages
36
Reaction score
2
Location
Somewhere I belong
Vehicle(s)
2025 FL5 Type R, 2023 G80 M3 Competition Carbon M, 2019 Range Rover Sport
HE cats like GESi (what TSP and RV6 uses), HJS, etc now are so good now, power gains over catless are pretty negligible. A couple/few hp (unless you're at like 700hp+). My shop is in an emission-less county but wont install catless for a customer (liability) because the surrounding major counties have emission inspections, but again, I explain its neglible anyway in terms of power differences. The turbo sound whistle will be a little more pronounced on a catless though.
Is it turbo whistle and sound going to be a lot louder with efficiency downpipe versus the stock one?

I've heard that with my PRL intake and turbo inlet pipe as well as a front exhaust pipe high efficiency down pipe and full exhaust it should make about 380 whp with a tsp stage 1 tune is that about accurate?
 


ctechauto

CivicX Basic Sponsor
Joined
Apr 4, 2025
Threads
16
Messages
276
Reaction score
409
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
FL5, FK8, EK9, 981, Gen 3 Raptor
Is it turbo whistle and sound going to be a lot louder with efficiency downpipe versus the stock one?

I've heard that with my PRL intake and turbo inlet pipe as well as a front exhaust pipe high efficiency down pipe and full exhaust it should make about 380 whp with a tsp stage 1 tune is that about accurate?
Its going to be more noticeable, yes. By how much? Thats subjective to an extent. I cant comment on powe figures, too many variables involved and I am not a ECU tuner.
 

Two Step Performance

Elite Sponsor
Joined
Apr 24, 2018
Threads
45
Messages
918
Reaction score
1,326
Location
USA
Website
twostepperformance.com
Vehicle(s)
2023 Type R
I wonder if the rv6 counted down pipe would throw a code? I have rv6 front pipe so I really want to possibly grab this one anyone have experience with it?

https://www.twostepperformance.com/products/high-temp-catted-downpipe-for-18-accord-2-0t
Yes, it likely would throw a code. If you are up for the challenge you may can get the de-fouler dialed in to work around it but it's not really an easy thing to adjust once installed in the car.

Our shop car makes ~575whp with our catted downpipe. No CEL and no smell. Even with catless I'm not sure how much more turbo noise you are going to get out of these relatively small turbos.
 

Superhatch

Senior Member
First Name
Jacob
Joined
Sep 22, 2023
Threads
9
Messages
177
Reaction score
272
Location
Wisconsin
Vehicle(s)
2025 RR FL5 CTR, 2025 Civic Hybrid, 1991 CRX Si, Honda Monkey
Please run a cat.

Aside from being illegal to run without one on the street in the US, NOx emissions are basically the worst things that cars produce. Having a cat, even a high-flow one really helps to reduce these pollutants in the air. The CTR out of the box is a ULEV50 vehicle which means it's emissions system does an extremely good job of filtering out NMOG, CO2, and NOx emissions.

A lot of the issues we had previously (smog/acid rain/ozone depletion) were due in large part to NOx and CO2 emissions, and adding cats and other emissions systems basically made it so we generally don't have to deal with those things anymore.

The difference between a cat and no cat is going to be a negligible amount of hp.

Fwiw a PRL intake helps to make a lot of the turbo noises more pronounced, and will add way more HP than removing a cat from a DP.
 


AZCWTypeR

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2024
Threads
6
Messages
359
Reaction score
271
Location
Yavapi County, AZ
Vehicle(s)
2024 Type R
The downside of catless is the strong exhaust smell.

My OEM Audi cats kept falling apart in the '80's and I wasn't paying the big $ after the warranty expired, so I ran catless. Performance difference with a "test pipe" was negligible, but exhaust smell was very noticeable.

My son had a high-flow cat downpipe on his Gen4 GTI and at least the exhaust smelled okay. Still needed an O2 spacer to avoid a check engine light.
 

Superhatch

Senior Member
First Name
Jacob
Joined
Sep 22, 2023
Threads
9
Messages
177
Reaction score
272
Location
Wisconsin
Vehicle(s)
2025 RR FL5 CTR, 2025 Civic Hybrid, 1991 CRX Si, Honda Monkey
What ever you do, don't look up china
Yeah, I don't live there, or Jakarta, or Bangladesh. I'm not on boards with FL5 owners in China, but if I was I'd say the same thing.

I'm a bit older so I remember when cars were getting ruined in transport due to acid rain, where you would have to cover or move your car inside if there was a potential rain shower that could damage your paint.

Or when there was a hole in the ozone layer which was a big fucking deal which we solved through regulation. Or how in the 80's we recognized that kids who lived near major roadways had more respiratory diseases later in life or when you couldn't see the skylines on summer days in major US cities because of smog.

I'm on board with pretty much every modification of street cars, and I'm even ok with a car you're driving to a show every few weeks not having a cat, but for a daily I think it's shitty when people remove cats and other emissions related stuff to make 4hp, and at the same time spew some of the worst chemicals into the air around them.

Is one car going to make a huge difference, no, but if we change the narrative in the tuning community that running without a cat on a daily is a shitty thing to do that would be a net positive and why I post this stuff in threads like these.
 

Clark_Kent

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2022
Threads
11
Messages
1,948
Reaction score
3,251
Location
Smallville, KS
Vehicle(s)
2023 Honda Civic Type R, 2023 Porsche 718 Cayman GT4
Yeah, I don't live there, or Jakarta, or Bangladesh. I'm not on boards with FL5 owners in China, but if I was I'd say the same thing.

I'm a bit older so I remember when cars were getting ruined in transport due to acid rain, where you would have to cover or move your car inside if there was a potential rain shower that could damage your paint.

Or when there was a hole in the ozone layer which was a big fucking deal which we solved through regulation. Or how in the 80's we recognized that kids who lived near major roadways had more respiratory diseases later in life or when you couldn't see the skylines on summer days in major US cities because of smog.

I'm on board with pretty much every modification of street cars, and I'm even ok with a car you're driving to a show every few weeks not having a cat, but for a daily I think it's shitty when people remove cats and other emissions related stuff to make 4hp, and at the same time spew some of the worst chemicals into the air around them.

Is one car going to make a huge difference, no, but if we change the narrative in the tuning community that running without a cat on a daily is a shitty thing to do that would be a net positive and why I post this stuff in threads like these.
Good points all around. You're likely dealing with a troll; don't feed them. I expect them to return with more drivel that will guide a legitimate inquiry down the soul sucking political path.

It's 2025, a wonderful year where a catted downpipe won't crush your 500+ whp dreams. Catted downpipes are just that good, and the value proposition for catless is no longer appealing. The next item on the docket is this obsession with having the ability to disable or defeat emissions controls. Slaying one dragon at a time I suppose.
Sponsored

 
 







Top