Spart
Senior Member
I don't doubt it, but in a data set of 7,000 oil samples things are going to be biased towards the lowest common denominator.0W-20 vs 5W-30: why did Lake’s 7-year dataset show
slightly lower wear on 0W-20?
Is the lowest common denominator folks who take their cars to a race track and beat on them for 15-20 minutes at stretch? No, it's people who just use their car as an appliance. If you car calls for 0W-20 and you commute in it, you'll never see engine oil temperatures that make higher viscosity oils worthwhile.
For that vast majority of folks, the blend and add pack will matter more than whatever number comes after the W.
With 7,000 samples, the vast majority of people are going to be following a manufacturer recommendation. If one manufacturer recommends xW-20 across the board and another recommends xW-30 across the board, the differences you're seeing are more likely down to the difference between manufacturers/engines, not the difference between two oils.
If you have a 911 Turbo S that calls for 5W-40, you're not going to look at this data and say "well I guess most cars work fine on 0W-20, so I'll start putting that in my Porsche!" The context matters. Well, unless you're this guy.
Honda's own recommendations from the UK owner's manual explicitly endorse 5W-30 and 0W-30.
To me, this is exactly backwards. Use an oil that you know will maintain hot oil pressure for a full stint, don't risk it and find out while your brain is trying to keep up with the next braking zone.Use the thinnest oil that maintains hot-oil pressure for a full stint.
There is so little downside to running a thicker oil on a car that's seeing track use. Err on the side of caution instead of trying to find the edge of what you can get away with, and hoping you don't fall off that edge.
Sponsored