PointByPatrol
Senior Member
- Thread starter
- #2,176
I'm going to run 285's at first, and no more than 295's in the future.11 inch wheel with 295 tires?
Sponsored
I'm going to run 285's at first, and no more than 295's in the future.11 inch wheel with 295 tires?
actual racecarYou don’t rub with 315? Even full lock?
@Rexpelagi had them on with the camber tops with about -3º lowered on springs. so if his fit, it will fit stock height suspension.I'm going to run home at lunch today and grab the one wheel that I opened, and the civic, and test fit the wheel. Not sure they've been fitment tested before with stock suspension and EVS ball joints. Fingers crossed they fit!
I should be able to get some decent photos from underneath if I can get the car on to the alignment rack. I guess I'll grab a Hoooooozur too to mount on the rim.@Rexpelagi had them on with the camber tops with about -3º lowered on springs. so if his fit, it will fit stock height suspension.
wouldn't mind seeing a sneak peak though
well the CTR is the FWD GT3285 sounds crazy enough. I can’t imagine 315. That’s what I see at the back of Porches.
Maybe a smidge, still likely weighs less than the factory wheel and tire combo.With such big sticky tires isn't that going to have some affect on the suspension?
~-2.5° *, I can't get more than that or the lower spring perch on the factory strut will contact the chassis, but yes it worked on stock suspension as well (with the pins pulled, so probably ~-1.9°) likely helped by the larger wheel gap.@Rexpelagi had them on with the camber tops with about -3º lowered on springs. so if his fit, it will fit stock height suspension.
wouldn't mind seeing a sneak peak though
The wheel articulates closer to the strut at full lock than you would expect based on the wheel being straight ahead, which is where the strut ears come into play.I should be able to get some decent photos from underneath if I can get the car on to the alignment rack. I guess I'll grab a Hoooooozur too to mount on the rim.
interesting....I don't think the ball joints move the strut that close to the chassis. I assume coilovers, being thinner, wouldn't have this issue and you can get more camber from the top~-2.5° *, I can't get more than that or the lower spring perch on the factory strut will contact the chassis, but yes it worked on stock suspension as well (with the pins pulled, so probably ~-1.9°) likely helped by the larger wheel gap.
![]()
Camber plates should be better for tucking the tires though as they pull the top in vs. ball joints pushing the bottom out, so keep that in mind.
That's not surprising since the ball joints move the bottom out instead of moving the top in, so I'd expect better chassis clearance at the same camber. And yes, I would not expect this issue on coilovers as the spring and perch will be much narrower. However, camber plates are better for fitting wide tires, because you are moving the top of the tire inboard allowing for more fender clearance (without sacrificing any shock-to-tire/wheel clearance).interesting....I don't think the ball joints move the strut that close to the chassis. I assume coilovers, being thinner, wouldn't have this issue and you can get more camber from the top