GoSailin
Member
- Thread starter
- #1
Hey guys. Anyone done cam work in their type r yet or know from experience how it handles it?
It does not seem to be as popular a job as compared to Chevrolet. I know it works VERY WELL with Chevrolet on a longevity basis and drivability. You gain more power at the top end of the power band plus an increase in max RPM. However I am totally new to the idea of camming a Honda lol. So if anyone has any experience or information on the pros/cons of this please share them. I am researching this now and trying to find a balance between drivability and performance, which means probably stage 1 maybe stage 2. So far it looks like 4piston and Skunk are the main companies making cams. 4piston has a good article on their build and results. I was looking for some more details though. Any other good articles out there? Not much on YouTube either that I can find.
For clarity, I’m not building a full race car. I’m building a 400whp on 93 pump, daily, some potential track time. Not using flex. From what I understand, even with full bolt ons I’m not going to get to 400whp on pump gas. FBO as in Hondata, dyno tune, intake, inlet charge pipe, down pipe, intercooler + pipes, with full exhaust. I think im going to be short 30-40whp short of that goal?
other related questions:
What kind of RPM max can these engines do before taking substantial life off the engine? 8000?, 8500?, 9000? it feels like Honda restricts this for pure reliability to reach the 300,000+ mileage life. You can notice some of this just by listening to the engine or exhaust during dyno tests. There is more there available or at least seems like it. How is that tractor lope after the cam? Nothing is going to compare to that Chevrolet lope I know, but how does it sound on a 4 cylinder?
lengthy thread I know but I wanted to get some discussion on this from anyone else who has considered camming!
It does not seem to be as popular a job as compared to Chevrolet. I know it works VERY WELL with Chevrolet on a longevity basis and drivability. You gain more power at the top end of the power band plus an increase in max RPM. However I am totally new to the idea of camming a Honda lol. So if anyone has any experience or information on the pros/cons of this please share them. I am researching this now and trying to find a balance between drivability and performance, which means probably stage 1 maybe stage 2. So far it looks like 4piston and Skunk are the main companies making cams. 4piston has a good article on their build and results. I was looking for some more details though. Any other good articles out there? Not much on YouTube either that I can find.
For clarity, I’m not building a full race car. I’m building a 400whp on 93 pump, daily, some potential track time. Not using flex. From what I understand, even with full bolt ons I’m not going to get to 400whp on pump gas. FBO as in Hondata, dyno tune, intake, inlet charge pipe, down pipe, intercooler + pipes, with full exhaust. I think im going to be short 30-40whp short of that goal?
other related questions:
What kind of RPM max can these engines do before taking substantial life off the engine? 8000?, 8500?, 9000? it feels like Honda restricts this for pure reliability to reach the 300,000+ mileage life. You can notice some of this just by listening to the engine or exhaust during dyno tests. There is more there available or at least seems like it. How is that tractor lope after the cam? Nothing is going to compare to that Chevrolet lope I know, but how does it sound on a 4 cylinder?
lengthy thread I know but I wanted to get some discussion on this from anyone else who has considered camming!
Sponsored