blueroadster
Senior Member
- Thread starter
- #91
I stated my rankings by caveating it with IMHO...Manufacturers should do their own design, development and testing to convince consumers to buy their product...Can PRL provide specific details about the CSF T&F core used as compared to cores produced and used by other companies?Catch me up here, are these rankings based on assumed airflow through the cores? Do we have any data regarding measured airflow (front to back) or any data on engine coolant temps comparing multiple options in a relatively controlled testing environment?
If you were to compare the J's Racing tube and fin to the new PRL tube and fin, the PRL option has a 10% larger face, and while it is 10% deeper (more internal volume / cooling capacity) it should still allow a fixed amount of air to flow through to the radiator easier (front to back) than the smaller faced option.![]()
Sponsored